JHCCoffee Will the flushing procedure (running the hot water wand until it stops) and also running 200 ml through the grouphead eliminate the increased scaling and pitting risk, compared to RO water with sodium bicarbonate?
No, it won’t eliminate it, though it will decrease it (and therefore decrease the ‘needed’ frequency of descaling).
JHCCoffee RO water will “carry away” any mineralization that may build up in the service and brew boiler water. Not sure whether this idea (of an RO water flush) makes any sense. Does it?
Magnesium carbonate is not really soluble in water, so any deposit of MgCO3 that has already formed will stay. What the rinsing may do is to carry away any loose particles that are on the surface of any scale deposit. If you are only using bicarbonates in the water, I don’t see any reason to flush with RO water, though if you were to fill the service/steam boiler with pure RO water regularly and then use it for steaming, it would further delay the need for any descaling.
JHCCoffee So once every week vs two? Thoughts?
If you use Rob’s spreadsheet, it will give you a pretty good idea of the frequency of flushing/descaling (on the ‘Calculations’ tab).
JHCCoffee What would they do that is different than what I would do?
They would use an acid solution (probably citric acid) to dissolve any scale that has formed. What you are doing/planning is not so much de-scaling as trying to decrease the speed of scaling (possibly down to zero). Prevention rather than cure, so to speak.
JHCCoffee Anything and everything that I have read on this forum says to avoid descaling, right?
I don’t know what you have read on this forum - I haven’t read all of it myself 😉; I would say that descaling is not ideal as it seldom works perfectly and it doesn’t help with corrosion. Personally, I think descaling is also a faff, and I’m quite happy using a potassium bicarb-only formula, having tried with MgSO4 and found that the taste difference (even if perceptible) is not enough in my opinion to warrant the faff.