Ah ok, 99% of that article is way over my head.
I made a quick diagram about how I imagine convex tamping working. I’m not saying the end result is better, I know it’s not from using both, but I 100% find a convex tamper results in consistently better shots with my lazy workflow - counter tap/distribution tool/tamp - no WDT.
Before the physics guys jump in, I’m absolutely not saying there’s science behind this, just reporting my findings.
Obviously both will fill the basket to the edges, I’m just wondering if a convex tamper creates more of a ‘sealed’ surface for the initial moments water is hitting the puck.