BrendaninBrooklyn
As far as i am concerned, those of us on this thread have been having exactly that type of thoughtful conversation that you referred to as being desirable to foster.
You do not know me either and so all we know of each other is by the content and quality of what we post about these topics. So how i have evaluated your views comes entirely from your posts. I describe what I see franklyand honestly and if u disagree, that’s fine.
I have also known of trump for decades before he ran for office - I am not as young as u seem to think I am! Trump has always been an in your face new York property developer type of personality- he isn’t pure as the driven snow and has done his far share of mistakes and bad choices but if u regard him so negatively as to see him as a “Swine” today and tbink u have always seen him as such, then I suggest that there may be a fair bit of revisionism working by your subconscious to justify the views u have today of him, because in no wise was he generally regarded in such a way by the gatekeepers of public opinion in those days…
In actual fact I used to subscribe to the same neo conservative liberal ideas that the mass media propagates until I began to see the cracks in the facade and began to question the orthodoxy. I don’t subscribe to everything the conspiracy theorists suggest either but I subject everything I read to the same critical approach. The result is the views I currently subscribe to which neither inform entirely to right wing nor does it at all conform to the liberal and left viewpoints. It does have more of what the right wing subscribes to but that’s because it seems to conform more to the likelihood and probability of being correct to me. So I don’t think I am brainwashed by righr wing, chicken wing or any sort of wing for that matter. I could still be wrong, but at least I have seen the whole spectrum of views on these topics and have consciously worked through it. And that’s the best any of us can really do…
I have to point out though where it pertains to what u have said is that whatever you say u have read, it is almost impossible to avoid being influenced by what the massmedia trots out. Even the science journals thar you say is your main reading content have become infected by woke ideology - see for instance https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-hurtful-idea-of-scientific-merit-controversy-nih-energy-research-f122f74d
In fact your usage of fhe leftist invented term “far right” already indicates you have been influenced without your knowledge by the mass media. That is a loaded term the left sympathisers use to unjustifiably associate people holding pretty much common sensical ideas with neo nazi types and skin heads - especially these days when right wing conservatives are fighting for food safety and reform of big pharma influence on the fda and big agri influence on the dept of agriculture etc and fighting against going to war against foreign countries and the left are fighting for censorship, suppression of dissent and contrary views, surveillance state, war in other countries, etc!
All those i know of who claim to not read media but came to their own views have turned out to be influenced by someone or the other in the end. I find it is far safer and better to be read all the media both left and right and then evaluate what they say and do your own thinking and reading as well.
So be conscious of the pervasive power of that effect and u have already disarmed much of its power!
I am glad though that you agree with the right wing solution to illegal immigration and i do agree with your final statement that time will tell if trump means what he says. So far he has been making the right moves, so let’s see and give him a chance to do his job…