I had a look at the Greenpeace site today, I admit it’s been a while. Causes of climate change are
- Natural Processes/Cycles (admittedly not mentioned by Greenpeace at all)
- Energy Generation
- Food production
- Transportation - cars, buses, trains, trucks, ships and planes, (unless electric and charged with renewable energy)
- Deforestation
- Powering industry
- Plastics and waste (I’m going to broaden that to all synthetics)
- Fertilisers specifically
I’m not sure how things would actually pan out if we significantly reduced all the above activities….I suspect it would not be good for the UK.
Also as far as Nuclear energy is concerned, the Greenpeace view is:
Nuclear power is touted as a solution to our energy problems, but in reality it’s complex and hugely expensive to build. It also creates huge amounts of hazardous waste. Renewable energy is cheaper and can be installed quickly. Together with battery storage, it can generate the power we need and slash our emissions.
Of course they double down on battery storage because Nuclear is not wanted and the statements about amounts of hazardous waste and expense are not accurate. Renewable energy is quickly stated+battery storage. This is true, renewable sources have to have energy storage, or you still have to use fossil fuels (fact).
Vistra finished Phase II expansion of its Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility in California, the company announced Thursday, adding 100 MW/400 MWh to the world’s largest battery facility.
The facility is now storing power and supporting the California grid, when needed, with a total capacity of 400 MW/1,600 MWh.
This sounds absolutely fantastic…but the reality is 22 acres of battery storage occupying a 107 acre complex with a total output of 1,600 mWh
Our UK minimum demand in the middle of the night averages around 23GWh, and thats every hour (as I am writing this the UK is using 32 GWh)!!!
https://grid.iamkate.com/
This means to satisfy our demand with no wind or solar for 12 hours will require an average sustained 28GWh. This means 250 Vistra facilities. This will give us a conservative amount of our nightly energy should there be No wind or Solar. Otherwise the lights start going out, ventilators stop operating, trains stop moving etc.. As the Vistra site probably cost 4 billion by now, we’d need to spend 1 trillion and occupy 0.25 million acres of the UK with batteries.
Our installed capacity of AGR Nuclear reactors is almost 8 GWh in 7 plants, meaning 28 plants could actually provide for our requirements over that 10 hour nighttime period at a cost of 616 billion
As you can’t really turn these plants off just divert the steam….you would only need a very limited renewables operation to provide the remaining extra power during the day. of course if it’s a gloomy day and the wind isn’t blowing….out go the lights!.
You can check this information…it’s all factual and proves battery storage+renewables cannot possibly be the answer, due to energy density and capacity of such a system.
It does seem a Nuclear program is all we are left with, what do we think?