Rob1 Wow that PDF posted above is awful.
A bit late for this discussion, but just saw that the marketing doc aggravated some people. I know (from work) how these things are made, with marketing people (often not understanding anything about the product or field) asking a few questions and then drafting some nonsense paper. Often it’s an “Ours” vs. “theirs” (or “the competition”) document, and obviously in the Ours column everything is dandy, great, fantastic, best in class, ground-breaking, cutting edge, five star, {insert made up name} technology; while the “the completion’s” is garbage, sub-par, average, daff, meh, obsolete technology that was never any good and generally just a load of s____.
In this case the marketing guys didn’t have an easy task. Their product came late, and was trying to copy what the competition did extremely well. But they still had to come up with something. So the result is inaccurate and misleading, but isn’t that what marketing documents are about?
I think no one would give this document a second thought if they found it on Eureka’s site, or if they called the columns “Ours” and “theirs”. But when it was taken out of context, and titled “Benchmark between” (but to be fair, it did have the Eureka logo at the top of the page) one might have, for a second (before actually reading it), mistake it for an honest comparison or an unbiassed review. As soon as you see what it actually is - a marketing document, then it’s just the same as any marketing material.
—
The grinder itself looks interesting. I would love to hear more from people who have it, especially from those who also have experience with Niche. An honest comparison, contrary to marketing, would be very interesting.
LMSC DavecUK Not many will have the luxury of two grinders. If you have to recommend one single dose grinder between Oro and Niche, what would that be?
Thank you LMSC for asking this question. I wanted to know the answer to it myself but was too shy to ask. And thanks @DavecUK for answering it.