- Edited
ez4prez Thank you for asking - and reporting back! So in reality the pressure differential has nothing to do with lowering retention. Read between the lines, and what they say is that because the exit chute is all around the lower burr, unlike in ‘traditional’ grinders where the grinding chamber has a floor and an exit hole, there is no (or lower) retention.
Is that patentable? I doubt it - there is plenty of prior art in terms of grinders that have no grinding chamber floor (the Weber EG-1 for example). Does it matter? Not in the least, as long as it works.