chlorox What I find interesting is that as soon as I did that, there is an almost reflexive reaction here to defend the evo and to run down the nurri. Why?
I think this is sadly a mistaken view. From where do you get this impression please? Are we expecting the members not to air their views on a machine that they had seen from conceptualisation to real time use and question the merits and demerits of the added features from a new machine? We all are matured, sensible, friendly and open here.
Members are just expressing their views and asking why we believe the added features of Nurri are important or bring any additional advantages over Evo? You or anyone except Dave won’t be able to answer why those features are important. We need to wait for the real users performances to kick in. Until then, it is a matter of diacussion.
I seriously doubt there will a performance difference. Nurri should be as capable a machine as the Evo. Both use the same xerox copy of the LM group, no?
End of the day, the customers stand benefitted.
