Thanks for the input, everyone! I do think my scale reads out to 0.1g, but repeatability is to within 0.2g. And given that the dose of coffee needed to change the taste seems to be at least 0.5g, I’ll just enjoy the espresso that I’m making and not worry about it.

Heck, maybe I’ll get enough confidence so that I don’t weigh the ground coffee anymore. 😆

    wilburpan Heck, maybe I’ll get enough confidence so that I don’t weigh the ground coffee anymore. 😆

    It’s a tough habit to shed. My beans are pre-weighed into single dose sealed glass jars. Yet I still weigh my beans (in the Niche cup) before grinding. And then I tare my basket/dosing collar, grind and weigh the grounds. If I haven’t let my NZ run long enough (to get that last 0.5g out), I’ll find I’m short. So I do try to let it run. Then I weigh yet again and sometimes (or more often than sometimes) need to use a cute little bellows to eek out that last 0.1 or 0.2 g. Verified by yet another weigh. It’s more than a bit OCD. 🤪

    But….if I simply dumped my pre-weighed dose in, let the NZ run sufficiently long, then pushed the bellows once, the end result (I know, I know) will be the now ground complete dose. Xg in, same Xg out. Good enough and I will never notice the taste difference anyway.

      wilburpan I’m sure that the increase is not due to retention.

      I understand what you are doing. But you didn’t follow my suggestion of not zeroing out the scale first when measuring the weight of ground coffee.

      Make a note of the weight of the container where your ground coffee ends up. Grind into it as you usually do. Put that on the scale. Subtract the weight from the container. Does that still read over the 18g you put in?

      I’m trying to assert your scale is not the problem by not zeroing it out first.

          MediumRoastSteam Knowing something about how scales work, I don’t see how zeroing/not zeroing would affect the scale’s behavior. The zero function just adjusts the zero point, which is an electronic function. Inaccuracies in repeatability are far more likely ro be related to whatever mass-sensing mechanism is used in the scale.

          Be that as it may:

          Turn your scale off; – Done
          Tare the container; – not sure what you meant by that, but this morning my container is 109.1g. I’m not hitting the tare button like I usually do.
          Put the coffee in ( say 18g)
          Note the weight of the container; – 109.1g + 18g = 127.1g
          Grind into the container; – you didn’t ask for this, but I put the beans into the grinder, and reweighed the container before grinding. Now it’s 109.0g.
          Weigh the container with the ground coffee in; – 127.3g
          Subtract the weight from the container. – again, not sure what you mean here, but I transferred all the coffee into the basket. When I put the container back on the scale, it’s 109.1g

              JHCCoffee Prior to that, I had an inexpensive scale. However the scale was slow to react to / display charges in weight, making it difficult to stop a shot at a precise output weight.

              I have a 9Barista, which means that the extraction I get is the extraction I get. So I don’t need real time readouts on weight for timing the extraction.

              Which makes my repeatability issue with my scale a bit more frustrating, as I just want to know the weight of the ground coffee coming out of my grinder. But since it seems like that doesn’t matter, that will save me from buying a new scale.

              I do think that if I had a conventional espresso machine, this scale would have been in the garbage by now.

                wilburpan - So it added 0.2g again… Interesting… But let’s not give up:

                Try a different experiment…

                Instead of putting the whole beans into the grinder and grinding them, but them back into the destination container over 15 seconds or so. In a way, pretending you have ground the coffee. :-)

                If you don’t get the exact same weight as your input weight, (i.e. it’s not adding the extra 0.2g) I’d be inclined to say there is no other explanation apart from grinder retention.

                If you do get a weight variation, then your scale is definitely bonkers.

                    MediumRoastSteam Dude. It’s the scale. If there was retention, and the scale was accurate, at some point I would’ve lost some coffee due to retention, and the scale would have told me so.

                    But the fact is that the scale never reads below the initial weight of the beans that I put into the grinder. As I said previously, I kept track of the weight after grinding over the course of one week, and by the end of the week I was up by over 1g. That’s not retention.

                        MediumRoastSteam Probably not, given that the repeatability error is smaller than the amount of change in the dose that seems to be required to cause a noticeable change in the taste of the espresso.

                        Just for kicks, I ran another set of weights according to your suggestion.

                        1. Weigh the container – 109.0g. Note that this is different than the 109.1g that the scale usually reads. I didn’t mention this before, but the scale says that the container weighs between 109.0-109.2, depending on the day. Most of the time it’s 109.1g, but there is some variation here.

                        2. Add beans until the scale reads 109.0g + 18g = 127.0g.

                        3. Take the beans out. Now the scale reads 109.1g.

                        4. Wait a while, and then add the beans one by one back into the container. When I finished, the scale reads 127.1g.

                          You guys are working in 0.0 of grams

                          Personally I really don’t think it matters that much

                          If you scales are wandering like a clock fair do but in coffee I don’t think it matters.

                          At work we mix paint in the 0.0g range and we even have a % of error were we don’t have to re calculate the mix.

                          Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

                          wilburpan While it is up to you if you would like to splash your hard-earned cash on a new scale or otherwise, would you be able to tell a difference on blind tasting if you were to make two cups with 0.5g/1.0 difference between them? I assume all other parameters are the same.

                          If you can’t, why bother? If you can, you are a super taster and you are going to lose some decent cash. I assume, you can get away spending money. 😂

                            Yuaga scale all you need £17 😂 mine are 2 yrs old

                            Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

                            a month later

                            I need a more accurate and responsive scale for my cottage setup. I have a Timemore Nano in the City but I recall seeing mention of another good one. Fyi I am not prepared to spend the $$$$ needed to buy an Acaia Lunar; I’d rather put that towards an espresso machine upgrade at the cottage. Any suggestions?

                              If all you want is a repeatable and accurate scale (no timing functions) and one which is actually calibrated you can find one in any price range from RS Components or similar sites that cater to industry and universities.

                              Thanks Sham!
                              I do need a timing function for the moment, as my current cottage espresso machine (Breville DuoPro doesn’t).

                              Bodum do a bistro scale

                              Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

                              JHCCoffee I need a more accurate and responsive scale for my cottage setup. I have a Timemore Nano in the City but I recall seeing mention of another good one.

                              If I’m reading this right, you have a Timemore Nano at one of your locations, and another scale that’s not a Timemore Nano in the second location. Why not just get another Timemore Nano?

                                Probably will, but I saw a post with CoffeeTime Forum members crowing about a scale. Can’t find the post, so I was hoping to jog people’s memories.