BrendaninBrooklyn
The issue is not how many times it takes but where one is at the end of it. And he is certainly very solvent today in spite of thr best efforts of the establishment to bankrupt him including of the most absurd civil damages award imaginable…
No, you wouldn’t.
BrendaninBrooklyn
Trump’s win over harris was not a landslide by the measure of reagan’s trouncing of Monday but it was not a slim one by any recent measure. He won by a greater majority than any other republican since 1988 - no mean achievement!
BrendaninBrooklyn
Why don’t you explain your logic in blaming the Ukraine war on trump then?
So how many times is what is essentially a welfare check acceptable to you. Is five okay? How about ten? Perhaps a dozen? Anyone can have a stellar balance sheet if they get someone else to pay for them.
BrendaninBrooklyn
It’s funny how u keep asserting that others shouldn’t presume to know u but here u e making false assumptions about me being a liberal arts major…
Why should I ? You don’t see it; that’s your problem or will be.
I may be wrong in this instance; however your smudgings of facts and details, led me to believe you had no background in science or engineering.
Cuprajake
What brendan chooses not to acknowledge is that the southern border collapsed as soon as trump was replaced by biden because biden immediately on the first day of his tenure reversed virtually all of trump’s anti immigration executive orders including rhe stay in Mexico directive and allowed the flood to come in and then after they come in to catch and release them into the population. Of course modt of them claimed asylum which allowed to backlog the court system for the next ten years and meanwhile they can work etc and get properly entrenched do that the Democrats cna then give them amnesty in another few years and induc ta few million more democrat voters to turn America into a permanent democrat voting dupr majority…
BrendaninBrooklyn
That logic must mean that you have no background in science and math given your defective reasoning and conclusions…
Or rather the real reason why you won’t reveal your reasoning is because you have none. So wrong and yet so unable to accept the truth…
In fact you were unable to refuse even a single one of my assertions on what the dems are really doing to illegally bring in millions to guarantee for them a prrmanent super majority and how biden counteracted trump executive orders to create the immigration catastrophe. The Democrats are the real existential threat to the Republic and to democracy and they have always been since their beginnings as the slavery supporting party, the party of the South in the civil war, the party behind the ku klux klan and the party behind foreign wars and expansion.
Trump 76.9 million votes // 49.9% of votes cast
Harris 74.4 million votes // 48.3% of votes cast
Hardly a mandate, a landslide, or any other such nonsense
Actually, the Trump wall was collapsing soon after construction. Real high-quality stuff just like his other projects.
There is a pertinent line from the Bard that I’m too polite to post here.
Reveal – why? I’m happy to discuss privately with persons I trust and respect.
BrendaninBrooklyn
You are still avoiding my point which is that he still won the popular vote nonetheless and it is still the biggest win of any republicsn since 1988.
BrendaninBrooklyn
If you had any real reasons, you would just spew it out just s you have stated so many other reasons on so many other things on trump above. But you won’t justify this particular point that trump caused the Ukraine war because you can’t. Own it instead of evading it.
And on your dig on not respecting me, you show your leftist nature by insulting me even though I never did that to you. I argue strongly but I argue fairly and I don’t resort to insults. The surest test of a leftist is their contempt for others.
BrendaninBrooklyn
Again another insult. You haveno substanrive reasoning to speak of so u have to resort to ad hominem attacks. The first person to go personal is the first person to lose - that is always the rule of the debate…
BrendaninBrooklyn
You cannot even hold coherence in your arguments - nobody mentioned the wall let alone its construction quality at all so it is entirely irrelevant to what we were debating on. Going after a straw man won’t save your flailing arguments…
