- Edited
CoffeePhilE Can’t disagree with your reasoning at all. That’s why I had asked two consultants those two questions. The mileage varies. Using a prop system carries higher risks of a single point of failure, while captive distributed systems has lower risks but higher dependencies of resellers. The market for home automation is still niche, hence expensive and the requirement to get some one to do it. It is complex too and needs to be done carefully as it could impact insurability and re-sale value.
My wife and daughter are capable, should they want it but they can’t be asked. That’s why a manual over ride is important. A few days of candles with no-recourse to heating in winter is a no, even if you and I are around. We are over thinking , but we need to have a plan. As others advised, a couple of spare servers and relays may also do.
This is the future; the technology will mature and I can see these becoming a norm in the future.
I don’t want the entire home functionalities rest crucially on accessing some one’s cloud. That’s why some of us like the local / home only access.
We are talking about convenience, ease of access and so on than significant gains. It would be perfect if these systems addressed the potential single point of failure, which is like buying an insurance. I think is a fair ask. It is also fair if the recommendations are spare servers and relays! 😊