Rob1 Interesting and yet how quickly complexity this area can get.
Rob1 I would find that really strange (unless you open the hot water tap every day or two). Maybe the evo just has a long refill and a deeper probe tip
I manage this a little differently to yours.
I steam once a day. After steaming, I quickly steam out for a few seconds to get the milk out, switch off the boiler and machine and draw a cup. This is used for washing, etc. I do not see any value in testing this every day. I know I have drawn more than the water lost in per steaming. I switch on, the boiler fills which is roughly equivalent to what I drew out. It may have added an extra 20-30 ML
The Evo probe is 65% into the boiler.
Rob1 Over the course of 4-5 weeks steaming approx 1 big jug a day (40 seconds of steaming approx) the boiler will need to be drained because from that point you’ll start to see scale building up.
So, do you draw 1 jug (how much please?) every 4-5 weeks or a full reflush after a light descale every 5 weeks?
Rob1 The point I was making about testing water from the steam boiler is alkalinity and hardness reduce as scale is formed until scale stops forming, so no matter what happens when you test the water you’ll conclude it won’t form scale. Of course, you’ll see it’s right on the edge/just a little over limit. In your case, you can track how close it is to forming scale as alkalinity and hardness both rise over time, but you can’t perform a random test and know when it started to scale if it gets beyond that point.
Either this is over my head I will never understand or I am not sure I fully agree with you (i.e. “it won’t form scale”).
Because, there is water sitting inside the boiler. After steaming, the minerals are left behind. You draw a cup of water — before fill — and that water must show enchanted level of hardness or alkalinity. If your excel is to be believed, that result must show whether scaling is formed or the risk is higher now than before.
I have tested the drawn water daily for some time, then weekly and now monthly. The data points were consistent in terms of where the scaling and alkalinity were over these time intervals.
Of course, it was a remineralised RO water with bicarb added. It is therefore not surprising the data doesn’t show scaling risks.
IMO, that must be sufficient. It doesn’t have to be exact as we can never say when it started forming a scale - we need a real-time monitoring for that. We don’t need this as I believe a static measurement is more than enough, the user keeps track of the data collected over time - keeping the trend of the data intact.
Rob1 Even doing this scale probably won’t be an issue for quite some time. I used Volvic in the old Expobar for months without descaling and didn’t have any issues.
True! agree.