As Niche Duo owner myself. I absolutely love this grinder. Not just the coffee , but the looks and workflow.

    i didnt say the speed had changed, i said they took longer to grind.

    Cuprajake My SSP MP burrs are taking 45s to grind 18g of beans. This is double the mazzer equivalent

    as is the stock mazzer burs take about 20s while the mazzer filter take about 10s.

    there is more than enough torque but when you look at the cut of the burr its totally different to a ‘stock’ burr from many manufacturers, no pre breakers.

    for me, im not very filter driven, never really have been, i prefer the kick of espresso lol

    Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

      Cuprajake
      Dont worry - I did not understand u as saying that the grinder has itself changed its speed of rpm. I took u to mean thar the speed in terms of the set rpm of the grinder had been optimised for the 151b burrs and thus it would take longer than it would be otherwise to grind if the rpm had been optimised for the new set of burrs.

      drdre89
      It does look and sound like a good grinder from the perspective of its mechanicals. Which is why I thought it would expand its market even more if it offered alternative burr options. Even mazzer itself is now offering high clarity focused burrs for the new philos and a more traditional set of burrs as the alternative burr option, so this is a good idea for niche to also follow its own burr supplier in doing …

      popular size though 64mm

      Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

      chlorox

      The duo has an RPM of around ⅓ of normal grinders. This allows it to have a higher torque and possibly other benefits (reduction of coffee grinding against itself).

      The reason the Duo can still have an acceptable grind time is because it uses commercial burrs with aggressive teeth designed to be used with a high torque 3phase grinder. The duo still grinds ⅓ slower as the commercial grinder, but when the original grind time is 6s, 18 isn’t that bad. Going from a 17s grind time to a 50s grind time would be more painful.

      Edit: I should also mention that the 151b burrs should not be used in most consumer grinders. They won’t have the torque to properly drive them.

      Loonster no sorry. it would depend which grinder they are in too. For example the DF DLC 83mm burrs will grinder a lot faster in the DF83V at say 1200RPM verus in the Duo.

      If there is one in particular you had an interest in, or a comparision of two, let me know and I’ll see if I have them installed and if so then I can run a comparision for you.

      DavecUK The reason a specific filter burr exists, is because “elephant in the room”, a burr that does both espresso and filter well, doesn’t exist and technically can’t.

      That’s been my suspicion for some time. There always seems to be a compromsie with an omni burr. Still, some come close e.g. the Hypernova Ultra S from which I can derive a pretty darned tasty espresso and filter - ditto for the C60.

      But agreed, it’s really preferable to have a dedicated grinder/burr for filter and another for espresso.

      Given my Significant Other’s tolerance of my obsession, I am fortunate to have grinders/burrs dedicated to

      1. light espresso (SSP HU)
      2. medium/light espresso (Varia Hypernova Ultra S)
      3. medium espresso with milk (DF DLC)
      4. filter for clarity (Ode Gen 2/ SSP MP)
      5. filter for body (Mazzer 151F)

      I appreciate that would be grounds (pun intended) for divorce in most households but it illustrates that in an idyllic world (IMHO) we’d all have a grinder that was 100% fit for purpose, and we wouldn’t have to compromise.

      Other than for travel because I’ve found it quite challenging to fit 5 grinders into a carry on when flying (I don’t trust “them” with my check-in bag).