spivechild But lets be fair, has it been proven to be “magical” Is what they state regarding pressure differential based on the design completely impossible?

Completely impossible - no, however I struggle to understand how this would happen, and more so in a way that is unique to the design of the Deva.

The funnel at the top and the chute at the bottom are open, at atmospheric - thus equal - pressure. As far as I can tell, there is no ‘pressure-retaining’ mechanism or device inside the grind path, just the axle and its supports, and the burrs. This means that - including the “fluid” that is the coffee-and-air mix in its various states of grind - all of the grind path is at the same pressure when the motor is not running. When the motor runs, there will be some ‘pressure’ (air speed) generated by the burrs (they can look a bit like turbine vanes, if you think about it), centrifugal forces that push the coffee/air mix, and some viscous drag around the axle - not different from any other flat-burr grinder.

spivechild Is it possible the same pressure differential is happening with these grinders too… regardless if it’s claimed or not?

I have observed that in my Ceado E37S used as a single-doser there is a ‘spurt’ of ground coffee when the last few beans are through; I have seen the same phenomenon occur in a Super Jolly used as single-doser. I think this is because whatever ‘low pressure’ was being generated in the centre of the grinder by centrifugal forces to push the beans (and some air - that’s why they are fluffy) through the burrs is being replaced by atmospheric pressure as the air can get through completely unobstructed. This however is a general ‘truth’ for any grinder that uses centrifugal force as a means (the main means, for a single-doser with flat burrs) to push the beans through the burrs. Claiming it as a patentable innovation strikes me as… well, marketing-speak, to be charitable.

    Unless I have missed reading, has it been tested using light and medium light? Thx

    My point is that it’s clearly being held there by static but the manufacturer is trying to bamboozle, just admit it’s static. I’ll eat my words when the patent goes through…

    Edit, no issues with the manufacturer btw, more than happy to see British companies producing good stuff. I think this type of grinder design would have been great for a conical burr set but then they’d be competing with the niche/key.

      I asked the question to an engineer and got told

      It’s like a vortex thing, air gets reduced, which causes higher pressure which increases air speed which “pulls” stuff through quicker cos of the initial low air pressure at the inlet, jet engines work on a similar principal

      That’s why they are wide,slim, wide slim

      Is the Deva the F1 guy?

      Decent De1pro v1.45 - Niche Duo - Niche Zero - Decent is the best machine ever made -

      • LMSC replied to this.

        Cuprajake I don’t understand the technical or the physics behind it, but, would we then not need a variable speed from start to finish for the logic to work?

        Newdent If it was static…. reducing the RPM won’t let the grind drop completely which happens at the moment.

        When I removed the little legs off the burr… I got like 6-8g worth of retention.

        Video showing the issue:

        NOW THAT IS STATIC.

        Yes, so if it was the pressure differential alone was responsible for stopping retention then the wiper arms wouldn’t be necessary right? I’d personally class grinds stuck around the burrs and in the funnel as retention.

        The wipers obviously do their job though. An owner on discord said the wipers and burrs getting pretty caked with coffee with no rdt though (static). I’m personally not saying the grinder is bad, I’m sure the issues reported could be dealt with easily enough.

        The narrow opening is the only part that would annoy me, I’d rather have the option of using a dosing cup instead of a scoop.

        • LMSC replied to this.

          Newdent You don’t spray a mist of water as suggested here? Is it the case with all roasts or just >= medium roast ?

          CoyoteOldMan

          Questions are from me. Responses are from Clare who work closely with Brandon at Deva:

          1. People I know who have had a chance to use it tell me it retains most of the grind while grinding and starts dumping it all out after you turn it off. I’ve seen this in videos as well. That you basically just have to press the power button a few times to get all the grinds out but after that it has very little retention. Is that how it’s supposed to work? Or are you working on modifying it so you don’t have to press the power button several times to get all the grinds out?

          Due to the build up of static, grounds may remain in the funnel while grinding. This static can be caused by grinding at a higher RPM, and not using the RDT method. We supply an RDT with each KOPI Deva and recommend 2-3 sprays per 18g to help reduce the static build up within the funnel. As we don’t have bellows in our grinder, we recommend pressing the power button a few times to get the remainder of the grounds out, and letting gravity do its thing by assisting with the grounds to fall into the dosing cup.  

          2. Do grinds start caking and getting trapped on the inner funnel and/or the wipers attached to the burrs and then lead to some grounds exchange happening every time? If so, have you measured the average amount of exchange for the machine?

          After rigorous testing, the retention of our grinder is within 0-0.2g of remaining coffee grounds. This is in line with a low retention grinder and it can be further assisted by using the RDT method and pulsing the side button a few times to help let the remaining grounds fall out of the funnel. There may be some grounds left on the walls of the funnel and the wipers, but it’s minimal and again, within the 0-0.2g of coffee grounds that may remain in the grinder.  

          3. On the website you talk about a patent pending design which creates a small pressure differential. I asked some people who know physics more than I do and here’s what they told me: "It looks to be impossible for a pressure differential to be created given what we know about the design of Deva. The funnel at the top and the chute at the bottom are open, at atmospheric - thus equal - pressure. As far as I can tell, there is no ‘pressure-retaining’ mechanism or device inside the grind path, just the axle and its supports, and the burrs. This means that - including the “fluid” that is the coffee-and-air mix in its various states of grind - all of the grind path is at the same pressure when the motor is not running. When the motor runs, there will be some ‘pressure’ (air speed) generated by the burrs (they can look a bit like turbine vanes, if you think about it), centrifugal forces that push the coffee/air mix, and some viscous drag around the axle - not different from any other flat-burr grinder."Without giving away any of your secret sauce given that the design is patent-pending and not fully patented, would you nevertheless be able to enlighten us on how a pressure differential is created?

          As the lower burr spins, and the wipers spin with it, it creates a pressure difference between the grinding chamber and the funnel. Another way of wording this is; when the lower burr spins, there is a pressure difference between the area above the lower burr, and the area below the lower burr.

          Where this differs from other grinders; 

          In grinders where coffee grounds exit horizontally from the burrs, this difference in pressure is only realised at that exit chute, which is usually a circular or rectangular hole.

          In the KOPI Deva, the pressure difference acts uniformly around the lower burr, which is also the exit chute, which helps to lower retention and prevent coffee grounds from being stuck to surfaces within the grinding chamber, or in the funnel.

          There are no pumps, or anything secret in the patent pending design which creates this pressure difference. It’s true that it is a phenomenon created by a spinning burr, but in the case of the KOPI Deva, the phenomenon is utilised to help minimise retention. 

            Thanks for sharing - seems like nothing special about the pressure difference - all grinders would have this aspect. I guess the vertical exit chute of the Deva is the unique part then? Hmmm…

            ez4prez Thank you for asking - and reporting back! So in reality the pressure differential has nothing to do with lowering retention. Read between the lines, and what they say is that because the exit chute is all around the lower burr, unlike in ‘traditional’ grinders where the grinding chamber has a floor and an exit hole, there is no (or lower) retention.

            Is that patentable? I doubt it - there is plenty of prior art in terms of grinders that have no grinding chamber floor (the Weber EG-1 for example). Does it matter? Not in the least, as long as it works.

            So as I predicted, what people are experiencing is caused by static. Thanks for clarifying.

            “…the retention of our grinder is within 0-0.2g of remaining coffee grounds. This is in line with a low retention grinder…”

            It would be close to a miracle if it were true.

            There isn’t a hard definition of ‘zero retention’ but Mark Prince suggested it was within +/-0.5g and this seems reasonable enough.

              6 days later

              MWJB Been using it non-stop for the last 2 months and for the first four times I cleaned it I had less than 0.3g of grind showing on the scale.

              I believe them.

                Otaibimn 0.3g is more than 0.2g.

                Do it another 6 times and post the weights for each of the 10 samples.

                I tend to think that dose consistency (every time you use the grinder) is the more useful measurement than retention (only when you clean the grinder) and that is seemingly very, very difficult to get below +/-0.2g.