chlorox Thx! As I said, it gives the user a choice, besides attracting potential new users who may be sitting on the fence. I know it is up to the user if they want to cut the shot using the new feature.
Innovations are good; the comments posted by the Evo owners / users should not be viewed as defensive at all. This is precisely the problem we all face - I always wonder why the comments posted by one segment of the machine owners to another are not viewed in the right spirit?
IMHO, it is normal if the members ask/discuss the value/utility or pros or cons of one over the other. The comments / discussion on the new feature, how the water would drain after the shot is cut, back flushing, lubricating, dry/soggy puck are not the by-products of a fear over the arrival of a new machine. I would consider them as genuine questions as those members have no view of how these are addressed. 🤷♂️
Example, my doubt was more on the back flush - water, or chemical and/or lubricating ? If lubricating, what are we? Is it fair if I ask. I do think it is. 😊
I know, we have seen a lot of Evo bashing in the past when the machine was not in the production stage and the comments were getting too personal elsewhere. It is all about freely and openly discussing the concept, agreeing to disagree and respecting each other as a person!