- Edited
I have no objection to putting some smart devices on internet access, and some (like Alexa) won’t work without internet access. This, I grant, is a trade-off between security/privacy on the one hand, and veratility and convenience on the other. I’m prepared to give up a bit of security/privacy for that functionality. So, given that I use them for internet radio, it’s hard to avoid having them on the ’net. I have no problems with certain light switches, too. Anythng with a camera, or security implications, not a chance.
I have some IFTTT-type routines for my absence, controlling lights and scheduled noises, like radio BUT …. one weakness of that approach is that no net connection = no Alexa. So, I also have some lights and a radio on semi-randomising standalone switches.
Note - I said last post that I didn’t recommend what I do as necessarily suitable for others. In part, that was about the privacy compromise, and in part it was because of how I go about it. One, but by no means the only, aspect of that is VLANs, MAC-filtering and two internet connections keeping smart home devices OFF my fairly carefully secured primary network. It also gives me redundancy if my main net connection goes down, and if I’m away and not using the primary network, it gives redundancy to the security aspects.
But how far to go? That is the question. Redundancy on net connections is one thing, but none of it helps if household power goes down, and putting in generators to stop risk that is, for me, way overkill.
The whole game is, in my view, a bit like backing up your computer - it’s a balance between cost and convenience, versus degree of protection. I know if I don’t take it reasonably seriously it’ll bite me in the butt, and the question is when, not if. But at the same time, I’m not wanting to go overboard about it.